Wilks Et Vir v. Manobianco
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Justice BERCH,
opinion of the Court.
¶ 1 Arizona Revised Statutes § 20-259.01 requires insurers to offer uninsured motorist (“UM”) and underinsured motorist (“UIM”) coverage to their insureds. Insurers may prove compliance with the statute by having their insureds sign a Department of Insurance (“DOI”) approved form selecting or rejecting such coverage. Ballesteros v. Am. Standard Ins. Co. of Wis., 226 Ariz. 345, 350 ¶ 20, 248 P.3d 193, 198 (2011). The issue in this case is whether compliance with § 20-259.01 bars a negligence claim alleging that the insurance agent failed to procure the UIM…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Gipson v. KaseyArizona Supreme Court · 2007
- Diana Glazer v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2015
- Orca Communications v. Ann Noder Et vir/pitch PublicArizona Supreme Court · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Marcie Normandin v. Encanto AdventuresArizona Supreme Court · 2019
- Butler Law v. Hon. higgins/winslow MemorialArizona Supreme Court · 2018
- Blk III, LLC v. SkeltonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2022
- Allen v. Prescott ValleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- Bogus v. GEICO Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.