Legal Opinion

Wilks Et Vir v. Manobianco

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 2015No. CV-14-0260-PRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice BERCH,

opinion of the Court.

¶ 1 Arizona Revised Statutes § 20-259.01 requires insurers to offer uninsured motorist (“UM”) and underinsured motorist (“UIM”) coverage to their insureds. Insurers may prove compliance with the statute by having their insureds sign a Department of Insurance (“DOI”) approved form selecting or rejecting such coverage. Ballesteros v. Am. Standard Ins. Co. of Wis., 226 Ariz. 345, 350 ¶ 20, 248 P.3d 193, 198 (2011). The issue in this case is whether compliance with § 20-259.01 bars a negligence claim alleging that the insurance agent failed to procure the UIM…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Gipson v. KaseyArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Diana Glazer v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Orca Communications v. Ann Noder Et vir/pitch PublicArizona Supreme Court · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Marcie Normandin v. Encanto AdventuresArizona Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Butler Law v. Hon. higgins/winslow MemorialArizona Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Blk III, LLC v. SkeltonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2022
  4. Allen v. Prescott ValleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  5. Bogus v. GEICO Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API