Legal Opinion
Bryan v. Southern Pacific Company
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided July 18, 1955No. 5846PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STRUCKMEYER, Justice.
This action was initiated in the Superior Court of Maricopa County, Arizona, for the recovery of damages resulting from a collision between plaintiffs’ automobile and a train under the control of the defend*256ant Southern Pacific Company. Trial resulted in a verdict in favor of defendants; from the judgment entered thereon and order denying motion for new trial, plaintiffs appeal.
Plaintiffs’ first assignment of er-Tor is directed to the refusal of the trial court to instruct the jury on wanton negligence. Wanton negligence has been repeatedly defined by this court.…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Johnson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Butane Corporation v. KirbyArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- Gas Service Co. v. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- DeElena v. Southern Pacific Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Alires v. Southern Pacific CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Danbois v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Arguello v. Sunset Station, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2011
- Coyner Crop Dusters v. MarshArizona Supreme Court · 1962
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.