Legal Opinion

Benedek v. Coe

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 6, 1940No. 1182Published

1Opinion of the Court

PINE, Justice.

This action is brought under Sec. 4915, R. S., 35 U.S.C.A. § 63.

The complaint prays that this Court authorize defendant to issue to plaintiff a patent with claims that have been rejected by the Patent Office tribunals.

The rejected claims are sixteen* in number and are directed to structural features of a high pressure fluid pump shown and described in plaintiff’s application for patent, S. No. 694,179, which was filed in the Patent Office on October 18, 1933. The claims have been grouped by the parties in the following order for consideration.

Group I

(Claims 22, 23 and 31)

As to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Barber v. Otis Motor Sales Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
  2. D'Arcy v. Staples & Hanford Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
  3. Eames v. Worcester Polytechnic InstituteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
  4. Podlesak v. McInnerneyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1906
  5. Seymour v. MolyneuxCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API