Legal Opinion

Seymour v. Molyneux

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 5, 1920No. 1244PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Patent Office. Interference proceeding in the Patent Office between George E. Molyneux and Dudley S. Seymour. From a decision awarding priority, Seymour appeals. C. L. Sturtevant and E. G. Mason, both of Washington, D. C., for appellant. John F. Heine, of Elizabeth, N. J. (Henry J. Miller, of Elizabeth, N. J., on the brief), for appellee.

1Opinion of the Court

ROBB, Associate Justice.

This appeal is from a Patent Office decision awarding priority on the record to the senior party Molyneux. Seymour’s application in this case is the same as that involved in Seymour v. Molyneux, 263 Fed. 468, 49 App. D. C.-; but there is involved a different application of Molyneux. The issue is expressed in 11 counts, of which counts 1, 5, and 8 are illustrative:

“1. The combination of stitch-forming mechanism and four-motion feeding mechanism, including a main feed dog for engaging the stitched seam in rear of the stitch-forming mechanism, auxiliary feed dogs for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Seymour v. MolyneuxCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McNeil v. MolyneuxCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API