Legal Opinion

Jorgensen v. Kingsland

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 18, 1949No. Civil Action No. 2337-47PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMM, District Judge.

The plaintiffs bring this action under the provisions of Title 35 United States Code Annotated § 63, Revised Statutes, § 4915, for the purpose of compelling the defendant, the Commissioner of Patents, to issue to plaintiffs a patent for the subject matter of the plaintiffs’ application for patent, Serial No. 585510, as defined by Claims Nos. 102, 119, 120 and 124 hereinafter described.

Plaintiffs Clarence H. Jorgensen and Peter J. Jorgensen, the latter now deceased, on January 8, 1932, filed in the United States Patent Office an application for a patent; which application…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Blackford v. WilderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. International Cellucotton Products Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
  3. In Re AustinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  4. In re WasserfallenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1924
  5. Lindley v. ShepherdCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bierly v. HappoldtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  2. General Motors Corp. v. Bendix Aviation Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API