Legal Opinion
Hight v. Dublin Veterinary Clinic
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)
Decided July 27, 2000No. 11-99-00151-CVPublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JIM R. WRIGHT, Justice.
The trial court granted appellees’ 1 no-evidence motions for summary judgment. Because we find that the trial court properly granted the motions, we affirm.
Background Facts
This case arises from the death of a Boer goat named Pancho. In their second amended original petition, appellants alleged that they were in the business of owning, breeding, and selling goats; that they placed Pancho with the Edwards “at their breeding facility for the purpose of standing him at stud, collecting, storing and selling his semen”; that an employee of the Edwards spoke with and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Kindred v. Con/Chem, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
- EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Gammill v. Jack Williams Chevrolet, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Wheeler v. Methodist Hospital, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
- Russo v. Smith International, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
- Cresthaven Nursing Residence v. Freeman, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2003
- Community Initiatives, Inc. v. Chase Bank of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2004
- Kelly v. LIN Television of Texas, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2000
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.