Legal Opinion

Gammill v. Jack Williams Chevrolet, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1998No. 97-0237PublishedCited by 735 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHecht, Justice

Whether summary judgment for defendants was proper in this products liability suit, as the court of appeals held it was, 1 depends on whether plaintiffs’ two expert witnesses (1) were qualified to give the opinions they gave, (2) demonstrated that their opinions were relevant and rehable, and (3) were denied a reasonable inspection of the subject vehicle. The lower courts answered each of these questions negatively. We affirm.

I

Deborah Gammill was driving her 1988 Isuzu Trooper about 40 m.p.h. on a two-lane county road at 4:35 p.m. with her three-year-old son Curtis in the right front seat and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  4. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1996

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by735 opinions

  1. MacK Trucks, Inc. v. TamezTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Helena Chemical Co. v. WilkinsTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Burrow v. ArceTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  4. McIntyre v. RamirezTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Earle v. RatliffTexas Supreme Court · 1999

730 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API