Legal Opinion

McManus v. Sequoyah Land Associates

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 24, 1966No. Civ. 22519PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action to recover from defendant, Sequoyah Land Associates, a corporation, one-half of the costs of improving an easement which runs across plaintiffs ’ property and which, at the time the improvements were made, was owned by defendant, and to enjoin defendant from trespassing on plaintiffs’ property. After trial without a jury, the court entered judgment for $21,374.82 in favor of plaintiffs, this amount constituting one-half of the amount the court found to be the fair and reasonable cost of improving the subject easement, but denied plaintiffs the injunctive relief…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Eastman v. PiperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Wright v. BestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Lawrence Block Co. v. PalstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Coronet Credit Corp. v. West Thrift Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. Carr v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1979
  3. People Ex Rel. Dep't of Pub. Works v. L.A. Cty. Flood Control Dist.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Estate of EhrenfelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Welk v. FainbargCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API