People Ex Rel. Dep't of Pub. Works v. L.A. Cty. Flood Control Dist.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKingsley, J.
This action was begun by the state to condemn real property owned by the Los Angeles County Flood Control District. A certain portion of the property sought to be condemned by the state, hereinafter called parcel A, is improved with paved ramps, which ramps provide the only means of ingress and egress to four parcels of land, hereinafter called B, C, D, and E. Defendants own parcels B. D and E and have a nonexclusive easement over a 30-foot, strip owned by Standard Oil, hereinafter called parcel C. The location and relation of these parcels is shown on the map appended to this opinion.
In…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
- City of Oakland v. Pacific Coast Lumber & Mill Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- City of Stockton v. MarengoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- City of Los Angeles v. GeigerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- County of San Diego v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Emeryville Redevelopment Agency v. Elementis Pigments, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District v. HalmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Placer County Water Agency v. JonasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Redevelopment Agency v. TobrinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.