Legal Opinion

Welk v. Fainbarg

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 20, 1967No. Civ. 8375PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCABE, P. J.

At some date in mid-July 1964, the parties hereto entered into an escrow agreement to buy and sell the real property which is the subject of this litigation. The pur chasers deposited $10,000 into that escrow, which upon the subsequent cancellation of the escrow due to the purchasers’ inability to perform, the $10,000 was later returned to them.

On November 16, 1964, a second escrow was opened at a title company in which the purchasers, and plaintiffs herein, deposited $20,000. The $20,000 was to be immediately released to defendants by the terms of the proposed escrow agreement when all the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Rodriguez v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Lawrence Block Co. v. PalstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Gibson v. De La Salle InstituteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Allen v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Lowe v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. In Re Marriage of WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Jones v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2006
  5. Steiner v. ThextonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API