Legal Opinion
Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Fischbach and Moore, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 14, 1986No. Civ. A. 86-794PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HUYETT, District Judge.
This civil action arises out of an alleged bid rigging scheme by defendant contractors in connection with bids submitted for electrical construction work to be performed at Bethlehem Steel Corporation’s (“Bethlehem”) plants in Steelton, Pennsylvania; Johnstown, Pennsylvania; Bethlehem, Pennsylvania; Burns Harbor, Indiana; Sparrows Point, Maryland; and Lackawanna, New York. Bethlehem alleges that starting in the 1960s and continuing indefinitely, defendants engaged in a combination or conspiracy in violation of section 1 of the Sherman Act.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Dayco Corporation v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Dayco Corporation v. Firestone Tire & Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- King & King Enterprises, D/B/A King Gas & Oil and Carl R. King, D/B/A King Gas & Oil v. Champlin Petroleum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Ashland Oil Co. v. Union Oil Co.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re MERCEDES-BENZ ANTITRUST LITIGATIONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- State of Mich. Ex Rel. Kelley v. McDonald Dairy Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1995
- Panna v. Firstrust Savings BankDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
- State of Colorado v. Western Paving Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Pennsylvania v. Milk Industry Management Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.