Legal Opinion
In Re MERCEDES-BENZ ANTITRUST LITIGATION
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 9, 2001No. 99-4311PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOLIN, District Judge.
This matter is opened before the Court upon the several motions of defendants, Mercedes-Benz U.S.A., L.L.C., Mercedes-Benz of Manhattan, Sheft Kahn & Co., L.L.P., Beifus Motors, Inc. and the joint motion of all of the remaining defendant Mercedes-Benz dealers to dismiss the complaint against them pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The motions (referred to alternatively, infra, by the singular “motion”) have been decided upon the written submissions of the parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78. For the reasons set forth below,…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In Re K-Dur Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
- In re Commodity Exchange, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- In re London Silver Fixing, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Hinds County, Miss. v. Wachovia Bank, NADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- CITY OF MOUNDRIDGE, KS. v. Exxon Mobil Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.