Legal Opinion

Panna v. Firstrust Savings Bank

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided October 30, 1990No. Civ. 89-3732(SSB)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROTMAN, District Judge.

Presently before the court is the motion of defendants Firstrust Savings Bank (Fir-strust); Neil I. Rodin, North Atlantic Investment Corporation (NAIC), Rodin Realty Investment Corporation (RRIC), Rodin Management, Inc., Rodin Enterprises, Inc., and Ivan J. Krouk (collectively, the Rodin Defendants); Blank, Rome, Comiskey and McCauley (Blank, Rome); Joseph Dennis Pasquarella & Company and Joseph Dennis Pasquarella (Pasquarella); and Laventhol & Horwath (L & H) to dismiss all counts of the complaint against them. Because of the complex nature of the case, 1 this…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reshal Associates, Inc. v. Long Grove Trading Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
  2. Panna v. Firstrust Savings BankDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
  3. Gilmore v. BergDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
  4. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. B.H. FranklinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. FranklinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API