Legal Opinion

Progressive Party of Oregon v. Atkins

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 9, 2016No. 10C20167; A151588PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHadlock, C. J.

This case relates to plaintiffs’ contention that defendant, the Oregon Secretary of State, violated a state election law in 2010 when she adopted OAR 165-007-0320, which required each candidate’s political party to be identified by a specified “three character designation” on the general election ballot.1 Although defendant repealed that rule in 2012, plaintiffs continued this litigation. In their first amended complaint, filed after the rule’s repeal, plaintiffs sought a declaration that any use of “three character designations” for political parties was unlawful in the past and would be…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Barcik v. KubiaczykOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Tanner v. Oregon Health Sciences UniversityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. Crandon Capital Partners v. ShelkOregon Supreme Court · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fenimore v. Blachly-Lane Cnty. C.E.A.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. Siletz Anglers Assn. v. ODFWCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  3. Siletz Anglers Assn. v. ODFWCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  4. Blevins v. Div. of Med. Assistance ProgramsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  5. Nevius v. PalomaresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API