Legal Opinion

Norgaard v. Port of Portland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 5, 2008No. 060505475, A134586PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

This case is about whether the Port of Portland is entitled to immunity from an action based on federal law under the doctrine of “pre-ratification immunity.” Plaintiff, who was employed by the Port of Portland, was injured while working on a vessel that was providing assistance to a dredge on the Columbia River. He applied for and received workers’ compensation benefits. Plaintiff later brought this action to recover damages under general maritime law and the federal Jones Act. The Port moved for summary judgment, the trial court granted the Port’s motion, and plaintiff appeals. Applying the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Alden v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Regents of University of California v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kuebel v. Department of Wildlife & FisheriesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Lucas v. Port of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. Lucas v. Port of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API