Legal Opinion
Gunn v. Lane County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided March 14, 2001No. 16-98-21765; CA A106775PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*99KISTLER, J.
Plaintiff brought a negligence action against Lane County and its employee Wendy Reese for damages that plaintiff sustained in an automobile accident. The trial court substituted the county for Reese and dismissed plaintiffs claims against her. It then granted the county’s motion for summary judgment because ORS 30.265 provides immunity to public bodies from claims that are covered by the workers’ compensation statutes. Plaintiff appeals, arguing that the statutes on which the trial court relied violate Article I, section 10, and Article I, section 20, of the Oregon Constitution.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Huddleston v. SawyerOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Hale v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- Mattson v. AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1901
- Hewitt v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Tanner v. Oregon Health Sciences UniversityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Syed Hassan v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Morsman v. City of MadrasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Stone v. FinnertyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- V. L. Y. v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Crandall v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2026
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.