Legal Opinion

MacDonough-Webster Lodge No. 26 v. Wells

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 1, 2003No. 02-103PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

¶ 1. This dispute arises out of competing claims to ownership of land at the boundaries of a parcel owned and occupied by plaintiff MacDonough-Webster Lodge No. 26, Free and Accepted Masons. The Masons appeal both the trial court’s grant of partial summary judgment on the issue of whether the lodge property qualifies for the charitable use exception to Vermont’s adverse possession statute and the trial court’s decisions on the merits finding that the Masons’ neighbors, the Wells and the Denisons, had acquired certain strips of land located at the boundary of the Masons’ property through…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Jarecki v. G. D. Searle & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Murray v. WhiteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  3. Gutierrez v. AdaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Dj Painting, Inc. v. Baraw Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  5. Braun v. Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Wesco, Inc. v. SorrellSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  2. Our Lady of Ephesus House of Prayer, Inc. v. Town of JamaicaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  3. Mahoney v. Tara, LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  4. State v. BryantSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  5. FIRST CONG. CHURCH OF ENOSBURG v. ManleySupreme Court of Vermont · 2008

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API