Legal Opinion
United States v. Claude S. Birtle
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 19, 1986No. 84-6264PublishedCited by 129 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge:
Birtle appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to vacate his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. In his motion, Birtle alleged that his counsel on appeal failed to provide effective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and we affirm.
I
Birtle directly appealed from his conviction of eighteen counts of fraud and related crimes, and we affirmed in an unpublished memorandum decision. United States v. Birtle, No. 81-1329 (9th Cir. Oct. 6, 1983). Birtle then filed a motion to vacate his sentence on the ground that his…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Gerald M. Schaflander, United States of America v. Stephen M. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by129 opinions
- State v. Quarterman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- Nazzaro Scarpa v. Larry E. Dubois, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Norman Elmer Miller v. J.C. Keeney, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Brent Paul SwansonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Marlene Eberle, and Robert Kiser v. City of Anaheim Anaheim Police Department P. Shepard Hagenson MonsoorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.