Legal Opinion
State v. Christopher
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 1, 1969No. 41355PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Murphy, Justice.
This matter is before us on discretionary review of a district court order granting the State of Minnesota’s petition to condemn certain park property located in the city of Minneapolis for trunk highway purposes. Rule 105, Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure. The court found that the proposed taking appeared necessary and was authorized by law and appointed commissioners to ascertain and report the damage resulting from the taking. The question for review, expressed in the petition of the Minneapolis Park Board, is as follows:
“The principal legal question involved in this…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Burnquist v. CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- HOUSING & REDEVEL. AUTHOR. OF MINNEAPOLIS v. Mpls. Metropolitan Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. Village of HartlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- State ex rel. Hilton v. VollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Minnesota Power & Light Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- County of Freeborn v. BrysonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Matter of City of ShakopeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. ByersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Metropolitan Sewer Board v. ThissSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- In Re the Commissioner's Order Denying Permit Application 93-1024Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.