Matter of City of Shakopee
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Justice.
The City of Shakopee petitioned for condemnation of certain land for a street easement. Claiming an interest in the land, the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) intervened. After a hearing, the trial court found that the city had authority to condemn the land and ordered commissioners to ascertain compensation for the owners. The MWCC now appeals from that order. We reverse.
The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) is a subsidiary of the Metropolitan Council set up pursuant to sections 473.501-.549 of the Minnesota Statutes to coordinate waste disposal in the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Shaughnessy v. EidsmoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. City of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
- Vermont Hydro-Electric Corp. v. DunnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1921
- St. Paul Union Depot Co. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- In re the proceedings by the St. Paul & Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEVELOPMENT v. JacobSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
- City of Shakopee v. Minnesota Valley Electric CooperativeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Town of Fayal v. City of EvelethCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Williams Pipeline Co. v. Soo Line RailroadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- County of Stearns v. VollerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.