Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Byers

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 2, 1996No. C9-95-1782PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

An assessed landowner, Hilda Byers, appeals from a district court order granting to the Department of Transportation a drainage easement over a portion of her property. We affirm.

FACTS

The state petitioned the district court to acquire from appellant a drainage easement over 43.96 acres in perpetuity. Parcel 329, upon which the easement is sought, is located near the intersection of Trunk Highway Route 92, renumbered 30 (“T.H.30”) and County Ditch No. 42 (the ditch). In 1964, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) reconstructed T.H. 30’s crossing over the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Hawkins v. County of KandiyohiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. State v. ChristopherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  4. The Kelmar Corp. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  5. Fischer v. Town of AlbinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. County of Dakota (CP 46-06) v. LakevilleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  2. Town of Fayal v. City of EvelethCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  3. Minneapolis Community Development Agency v. Opus Northwest, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  4. Housing & Redevelopment Authority in & for Richfield v. Walser Auto Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  5. State Ex Rel. Hatch v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API