Legal Opinion

Myers v. Harness

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 12, 1925No. 12562PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action was instituted by Ada Myers, plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, against L. R. Kershaw and John R. Harness, as defendants, to recover possession of and quiet the title to certain real property situated in Creek county, described as the southwest quarter of section 11, township 18 north, range 10 east, containing 160 acres.

It was alleged in the amended petition, among other things that Ada Myers is a new-born Creek freedman, enrolled as such, and as such citizen she received the said land as her allotment; that during the period between the 16th day of April, 1909, and the 7th day…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. McIntosh v. HoltgraveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Tucker v. LeonardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Carlile v. National Oil & Development Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Byers v. BrisleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Harness v. MyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. Harrison v. OrwigSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Rock Island Implement Co. v. PearseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Smith v. PageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Bigpond v. MutalokeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API