Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Orwig

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 12, 1931No. 19745PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

The parties herein appear - in the same order in which they appeared in the trial court, and for convenience they will be hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs and defendants, respectively.

The facts necessary to a determination of the contentions herein made are substantially as follow s:

The land herein involved was allotted to Hilly, a female, enrolled as a full-blood member of the Seminole Tribe of Indians, as her distributive share of the tribal lands of the Seminole Tribe of Indians.

Hilly died on the 26th day of March, 1915, leaving as hér sole heirs at law, her husband, Jefferson…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Welch v. FochtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Jefferson v. GallagherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Tiger v. DrumrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Sockey v. WinstockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Berryhill v. RhodesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  2. Protest of Gulf Pipe Line Co. v. Gulf Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF BERRYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  4. Deere v. Gypsy Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. Bearhead v. American Investment Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API