Legal Opinion

Vance v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 26, 1920No. Civ. No. 3384PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The petition is denied. [1] By his general appearance in the justice's and superior court petitioner waived his right to raise the question of jurisdiction.Holbrook v. Superior Court, 106 Cal. 589, [39 P. 936], does not aid him. That case was decided when section 890, subdivision 4, of the Code of Civil Procedure expressly provided that the objection that the action was brought in the wrong county might be made at the trial. In 1905 [Stats. 1905, p. 44], the section was amended, and subdivision 4 thereof now merely provides that the action may be dismissed "when the action is brought in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Olcese v. Justice's Court of the First Judicial Twp.California Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Holbrook, Merrill & Stetson v. Superior Court of Sacramento CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Am. Law Book Co. v. Superior Court of Santa ClaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Schuler-Knox Co. v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. Gulick v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Van Horn v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Bogmuda v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  5. Morte v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API