Legal Opinion

Bogmuda v. Young

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 1922No. Civ. No. 2495PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

Petitioner asks this court to review the proceedings in the superior court of San Joaquin County in a cause wherein P. D. Hart was plaintiff and petitioner was defendant.

It is alleged that Hart brought an action against petitioner in Stockton township and in the complaint therein averred “that within two years last past said plaintiff rendered labor to said defendant, at the latter’s special instance and request, in the agreed value of $325; that upon said amount the sum of $100 has been paid, leaving due the sum of $225, no part of which has been paid”; that summons was duly issued and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Olcese v. Justice's Court of the First Judicial Twp.California Supreme Court · 1909
  2. In re Estate of WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Matter of HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Jolley v. FoltzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Roberts v. Police Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. De Matei v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. Morte v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Meads v. WarneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Firpo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. Adolph M. Schwartz, Inc. v. Burnett PharmacyAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API