Legal Opinion
Gulick v. Justice's Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 31, 1929No. Docket No. 13PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
On April 8, 1927, one Thomas J. Casey-filed an action in the respondent court praying judgment against D. C. Gulick, defendant there and appellant here, in the sum of $150.
It appears that appellant incurred an indebtedness in the township of Indio, in Riverside County, to Casey, and on March 30, 1927, in the same township and county, gave him his check in the sum of $150, made payable to Thos. J. Casey, dated at Los Angeles, California, and drawn on the Pacific National Bank, Los Angeles, California. The check was sent through the usual channels for collection and when it reached the Pacific…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Olcese v. Justice's Court of the First Judicial Twp.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Grinbaum v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Chaplin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Vance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
3Cited by12 opinions
- Armstrong v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Schuler-Knox Co. v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Dunn v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Van Horn v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Allen v. FlournoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.