Legal Opinion
Morte v. Justice's Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 9, 1934No. Civ. No. 8879PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
An appeal from a judgment denying a petition for a writ of prohibition.
It appears that Oakland and Brooklyn townships in the county of Alameda each has a population exceeding 30,000 *606and that there is no municipal court in said county. On January 29, 1932, one Freitas brought suit against petitioner, as administrator of the estate of Manuel G. Morte, deceased, ,in the Justice’s Court of Oakland Township on a rejected claim against said estate in the sum of $378; that petitioner appeared before said Justice’s Court and moved for a dismissal of the action on the ground that the court…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Olcese v. Justice's Court of the First Judicial Twp.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Jolley v. FoltzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Lowe v. AlexanderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Gulick v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Van Horn v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Raps v. RapsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Hernandez v. National Dairy Products Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Proctor & Schwartz v. Superior Court of San Mateo CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950