Legal Opinion

Holbrook, Merrill & Stetson v. Superior Court of Sacramento County

California Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1895No. 18371PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Writ op Review to the Superior Court of Sacramento county. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Haynes, C.

This is a proceeding to review the action of the superior court of the county of Sacramento, Hon. A. P. Gatlin, judge, in a cause wherein the petitioner was plaintiff and Samuel Caldwell was defendant.

The petitioner commenced an action in the justice’s court, in the county of Sacramento, against said Caldwell, a resident of Woodland township, in Yolo county, alleging in the complaint that the defendant promised to pay the moneys sued for to the plaintiff at the city of Sacramento, and service was made upon the defendant in Yolo county.

The defendant appeared specially in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bullard v. McArdleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Redlands High School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Hamberger v. Police CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  3. Van Horn v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Vance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Wilcox v. Toston State BankMontana Supreme Court · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API