Legal Opinion
Paul Mohr, Jr. v. Murphy Elementary School District
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 8, 2011No. 10-16275UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
In October 2009, the Governing Board (the “Board”) of the Murphy Elementary School District (the “District”) initiated termination proceedings against Paul Mohr, the District Superintendent, after he was arrested for shoplifting a bottle of wine from a local grocery store. In January 2010, Mohr and his wife filed an Amended Complaint in Arizona state court asserting claims for breach of contract, tortious interference, violation of Mohr’s right to procedural due process, and violation of the Arizona Open Meeting Law. On January 25, 2010, defendants removed the case to the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Engquist v. Oregon Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Proctor v. Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Comm'n on Ethics of Nev. v. HansenNevada Supreme Court · 2018
- Amato v. Tekberry, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
- THE COMM'N. ON ETHICS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA VS. HANSENNevada Supreme Court · 2018
- THE COMM'N. ON ETHICS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA VS. HANSENNevada Supreme Court · 2018