Legal Opinion

Amato v. Tekberry, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 17, 2025No. 4:24-cv-08637Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 WILLIAM JOHN AMATO, Case No. 24-cv-08637-JST Plaintiff, 8 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 v. REMAND 10 TEKBERRY, INC., Re: ECF No. 15 Defendant. 11 12 13 Before the Court is Plaintiff William John Amato’s motion to remand, ECF No. 15. 14 Because Defendant Tekberry, Inc.’s notice of removal was untimely, Court will grant the motion. 15 I. BACKGROUND 16 Plaintiff William John Amato brings this putative class action pursuant to the Fair Credit 17 Reporting Act (FCRA),

15 U.S.C. § 1681

et seq., and similar state laws. ECF No. 1-1…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Sarmad Syed v. M-I, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. Paul Mohr, Jr. v. Murphy Elementary School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API