Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Tingcungco

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 2015No. B253003PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUBIN, J. —

Allegheny Casualty Company appeals from the order denying its motion to vacate its forfeiture of a bail bond, contending that the applicable statute required additional tolling of the forfeiture period while prosecutors decided whether to extradite a fugitive who had been located in a foreign country. We disagree and affirm the order.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On August 30, 2012, Allegheny Casualty Company, through its agent, posted $50,000 bail for Ericson Tingcungco, who had been charged with burglary. When Tingcungco did not appear as ordered on September 5, 2012, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  2. People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. California Court Reporters Ass'n v. Judicial CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. People v. MeyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. People v. HuntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. Financial Casualty & Surety, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. People v. Fin. Cas. & Sur., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. People v. Int'l Fid. Ins. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. Jetsuite, Inc. v. Cnty. of L. A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. JetSuite v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API