Legal Opinion

Trans-Action Commercial Investors, Ltd. v. Firmaterr, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 23, 1997No. A075777PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PARRILLI, J.

In this case we must decide whether a lawyer can be ordered to pay an opposing party $50,000 in counsel fees and costs under California Rules of Court, rule 227, as a sanction for causing a mistrial. Rule 227 provides that a court “may order the person at fault” for failure to comply with a court order “to pay the opposing party’s reasonable expenses and counsel fees ... in addition to any other sanction permitted by law.” We recognize the rule was intended to consolidate existing statutory authority. However, the plain terms of rule 227 purport to confer on trial courts a…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Crowley v. KatlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Garcia v. McCutchenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Mann v. CracchioloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Olmstead v. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.California Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Jevne v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Clark v. Optical Coating Laboratory, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Stephen Slesinger, Inc. v. Walt Disney Co.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Bryan v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API