Legal Opinion

United States v. Malone

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 21, 1924No. 2328PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBabbeR, Judge

The wool on certain imported sheepskins was classified and assessed for duty under paragraph 18 of the emergency tariff act of 1921 as clothing wool. In order to determine the quantity of such wool the customs officials sheared skins of average weight and applied the percentage of wool found thereon to all the skins of the shipment.

The skins themselves were allowed free entry by the collector apparently under paragraph 603 of the tariff act of 1913. Importer protested the classification and assessment of the wool and as ground therefor claimed, that the emergency tariff act was inapplicable…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. SalambierSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Carter v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  3. United States v. Sheldon & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  4. Bliven v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  5. United States v. Davies Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. George C. Whitney Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. Knutsen v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
  3. Connor v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  4. Modlin v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  5. United States v. WanamakerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API