Legal Opinion

Knutsen v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 9, 1943No. C. D. 776PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Keefe, Judge:

At the trial of this case counsel for the Government moved to dismiss the protest for the reason that a power of attorney was not on file in the collector’s offi.ce authorizing Lawrence & Tuttle to file protests on behalf of the plaintiff, The Government cited as authority, article 849 of the Customs Regulations of 1937, providing as follows:

Art; 849. Form of protest — (a) * * *. A protest signed by an agent or attorney shall be rejected by the collector unless there is filed with the collector a power of attorney (customs Form 5295) authorizing such agent or attorney to make,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. MarxCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. States v. StrausCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  3. United Bulb Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  4. United States v. McCoyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  5. United States v. MaloneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. King v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
  2. Rissman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  3. Berg v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  4. Hopkins v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API