Knutsen v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Keefe, Judge:
At the trial of this case counsel for the Government moved to dismiss the protest for the reason that a power of attorney was not on file in the collector’s offi.ce authorizing Lawrence & Tuttle to file protests on behalf of the plaintiff, The Government cited as authority, article 849 of the Customs Regulations of 1937, providing as follows:
Art; 849. Form of protest — (a) * * *. A protest signed by an agent or attorney shall be rejected by the collector unless there is filed with the collector a power of attorney (customs Form 5295) authorizing such agent or attorney to make,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. MarxCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- States v. StrausCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
- United Bulb Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
- United States v. McCoyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
- United States v. MaloneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- King v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
- Rissman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
- Berg v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
- Hopkins v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950