Legal Opinion

United States v. Davies Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 13, 1922No. 2190PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

Lamb pelts imported at the port of New York were classified by the collector of customs as lambskins with the wool on. The skins were admitted free of duty under paragraph 603 of the tariff act of 1913, and the wool on the skins was assessed for duty at 15 cents per pound under paragraph 18 of the emergency tariff act of 1921 as unwashed clothing wool. Paragraph 603 of the act of 1913 and the material parts of paragraph 18 of the emergency tariff act are as follows:

603. Skins of hares, rabbits, dogs, goats, and sheep, undressed.

18. Wool, commonly known as clothing wool, including hair of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Reiche v. Smythe, CollectorSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Arthur v. LaheySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Arthur v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. United States v. BeierleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  5. Worthington v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hamfton v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. Pitney-Bowes, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. Joleo Impex Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  4. Stone & Downer Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  5. United States v. HoganCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API