George C. Whitney Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge
Imported lithographed valentines were classified by the collector of customs at the port of Boston as greeting cards with text or greeting and assessed for duty at 45 per centum ad valorem under that part of paragraph 1310 of the Tariff Act of 1922 which reads as follows:
1310. * * * greeting cards, including those in the form of folders and booklets * * * with text or greeting, 45 per centum ad valorem * * *.
The president and treasurer of the importing company, without the aid of counsel, protested against the classification of the collector and claimed that the goods were not greeting cards…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Arthur v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Davies v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Schell's Executors v. FauchéSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Greely's Administrator v. BurgessSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- United States v. SalambierSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Whitaker ex rel. Account of Volkart Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
- Arthur Jaffe, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
- Norwood Imports v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
- Modlin v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- Po-Chien, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982