Legal Opinion
Whipple v. Fardig
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 10, 1929PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.
The automobile truck of the plaintiff was damaged December 16th, 1926, at Unionville by reason of a collision with an automobile driven by John Fardig and owned by Agnes Fardig his wife. This was a family car and was being driven by the husband with the consent of the wife, from his home in Hartford to Torrington, at which latter place he was under employ by The Lotz Asbestos Company.
On January 17th, 1927, the plaintiff brought an action against The Lotz Asbestos Company for damage to his truck caused by the collision, in the belief that at the time of the collision John Fardig was engaged…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Aaronson v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Ford v. H. W. Dubiskie & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Valentine v. PollakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Hunter v. PopeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Callahan v. JursekSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cogan v. Chase Manhattan Auto Financial Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Fox v. SchaefferSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- S. T. McKnight Co. v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- Hasler v. T. H. Canty & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Finkle v. CarrollConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.