Legal Opinion

Hasler v. T. H. Canty & Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 13, 1951PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Baldwin, J;

This is an appeal from the denial of a motion to set aside a defendant’s verdict and from the judgment, alleging errors in the charge. The complaint set out a cause of action based upon negligence and nuisance, but the claim of nuisance was not pressed. The answer was a general denial with a special defense alleging contributory negligence.

The jury could reasonably have found the following facts: The plaintiff was employed as a secretary in an office on the second floor of a building owned by the defendant on Wall Street in Norwalk. The door to the office was in the middle of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ziman v. WhitleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  2. Meglio v. ComeauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  3. World Fire & Marine Insurance v. Alliance Sandblasting Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  4. Beauton v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  5. Gipstein v. KirshenbaumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Harry A. Finman & Son, Inc. v. Connecticut Truck & Trailer Service Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  2. Begley v. Kohl & Madden Printing Ink Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  3. Levett v. EtkindSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  4. Royal Homes, Inc. v. Dalene Hardwood Flooring Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
  5. Kelly v. BlissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API