Hasler v. T. H. Canty & Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Baldwin, J;
This is an appeal from the denial of a motion to set aside a defendant’s verdict and from the judgment, alleging errors in the charge. The complaint set out a cause of action based upon negligence and nuisance, but the claim of nuisance was not pressed. The answer was a general denial with a special defense alleging contributory negligence.
The jury could reasonably have found the following facts: The plaintiff was employed as a secretary in an office on the second floor of a building owned by the defendant on Wall Street in Norwalk. The door to the office was in the middle of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ziman v. WhitleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Meglio v. ComeauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- World Fire & Marine Insurance v. Alliance Sandblasting Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Beauton v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Gipstein v. KirshenbaumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Harry A. Finman & Son, Inc. v. Connecticut Truck & Trailer Service Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Begley v. Kohl & Madden Printing Ink Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Levett v. EtkindSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Royal Homes, Inc. v. Dalene Hardwood Flooring Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Kelly v. BlissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.