Legal Opinion

S. T. McKnight Co. v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 16, 1941No. Nos. 11888, 11891PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODROUGH, Circuit Judge.

The S. T. McKnight company is, and long has been, the owner of a half of Lot 9, Block 222, Hoag & Bell’s Addition to Minneapolis, Minnesota, on South Sixth Street, in the downtown part of the city. In 1909 it executed a lease of the property for 100 years to Charles D. Collins, lessee. The lease was assignable and Collins promised, but failed, to assign it to John E. Andrus. By the decree in a suit for specific performance brought by Andrus against Collins and others in 1913, the lease was assigned to Andrus. In 1921 Andrus assigned the lease and transferred it in…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Consolidated Coal Co. v. PeersIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Craig v. SummersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  3. Wm. Lindeke Land Co. v. KalmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  4. County of Olmsted v. BarberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  5. Short v. Van DykeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rourke v. GarzaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  2. DC Farms, LLC v. Conagra Foods Lamb Weston, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. S. L. Nusbaum & Co. v. Atlantic Virginia Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1966
  4. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Eagle Iron WorksDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1973
  5. Whitney v. LeightonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API