United States v. Clark
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
DeFORD, Judge:
The appellant, contrary to his pleas, was convicted of arson and housebreaking in violation of Articles 126 and 130, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), (10 U.S.C. §§ 926 and 930). He received an approved sentence that included a dishonorable discharge, confinement at hard labor for two years, forfeiture of all pay and allowances and reduction to the grade of Private (E-l).
Among several assignments of error, appellant alleges that the trial judge committed prejudicial error by (1) advising court. members that he was convinced that the appellant’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Richard Floyd InmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
- United States v. GrundenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. Frederick J. FayetteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Ralph Bear Killer, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. DanielsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
- United States v. BuckinghamU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980
- United States v. HitchmanU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. PhillipsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
- Littleton v. PersonsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.