Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Daniels

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided February 27, 1987No. CM 448673PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

PAULEY, Senior Judge:

The appellant was tried by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members at Fort Bragg, North Carolina. Contrary to his pleas, he was found guilty of carrying and discharging a firearm on post, and possession of marijuana, in violation of Articles 92 and 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereinafter cited as UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. §§ 892 and 912a (1982 and Supp. II 1984), respectively. Additionally, he was found guilty, by exceptions and substitutions, of involuntary manslaughter (by culpable negligence) under Article 119, UCMJ, 10…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Pell v. ProcunierSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. LovettSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. United States v. PalmiterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  5. United States v. SuzukiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. WalkerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989
  2. United States v. McCallisterU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
  3. United States v. FogartyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
  4. United States v. HitchmanU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
  5. United States v. PhillipsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API