Legal Opinion

Briggs v. American Air Filter Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 14, 1980No. 78-2739PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge:

We must today interpret the “extension telephone exception” to the prohibition against wiretapping and electronic surveillance contained in Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2520 (“Title III”). In particular, we must decide whether defendant-appellee William F. McClure, Jr., used a telephone “in the ordinary course of ... business” when he used it to listen to a conversation between plaintiffs-appellants Philip Briggs and Dan C. Roby.

We might wish we had planted a powerful electronic bug in a Congressional…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Waco v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. United States v. William Allan JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
  4. Beverly Camp Simpson v. John G. Simpson, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. United States v. Michael William CleggCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Kleiner v. First National Bank of AtlantaDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1983
  2. PBA Local No. 38 v. Woodbridge Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
  3. Carmie Watkins v. L.M. Berry & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Fearnow v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. Deal v. SpearsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API