Legal Opinion
PBA Local No. 38 v. Woodbridge Police Department
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 9, 1993No. Civ. A. 89-3314 (MTB)PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARRY, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Plaintiffs, PBA Local No. 38 and certain current and former police officers of the Township of Woodbridge, bring this action against the Woodbridge Police Department and the Township of Woodbridge (together “the Woodbridge defendants”), the former and current Police Directors, the former Mayor of the Township of Woodbridge, and New Jersey Bell Telephone Company (“NJB”). Plaintiffs allege that electronic listening and taping devices were surreptitiously placed in certain areas of police headquarters and on the building’s phone lines. As a result,…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Forsyth v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Trafton v. City of WoodburyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
- Johnson v. City of Erie, Pa.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Nicholson v. LenczewskiDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Fearnow v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.