Legal Opinion
Carmie Watkins v. L.M. Berry & Company
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided May 2, 1983No. 82-7007PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDWARD S. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
In this case appellant Watkins sued her employer, L.M. Berry & Company, and others, alleging violation of the federal wiretapping statute, title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2520 (1976). 1 The district court granted summary judgment on the merits against Watkins, and she now appeals. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
I
The facts have not been developed in detail, but their general outline is undisputed. Carmie Watkins was employed as a sales representative by L.M. Berry & Company (Berry Co.).…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Richard Kay HarpelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Susan Paul (79-5061), and Arnold Chester Pierce (79-5082)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- Francesco G. Campiti v. Michael A. WalonisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- James v. Newspaper Agency Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Jerry AxselleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Gerald Griggs-Ryan v. Beulah Smith, Gerald Griggs-Ryan v. Richard ConnellyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Jessie Walker v. Thomas E. Darby, Hugh L. Robinson, Jr., and Kenneth DayCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Williams v. PoulosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Angelo Amen, Mark A. Deleonardis, Michael Paradiso and Oreste Abbamonte, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- In re Yahoo Mail LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.