Legal Opinion
State ex rel. McCann v. Bank of America, N.A.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 11, 2011No. A126494PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BRUINIERS, J.
Joseph McCann and Douglas Valdetero (Appellants) brought a qui tarn action against Bank of America, N.A. (BOA), in the name of the State of California under California’s False Claims Act (CFCA; Gov. Code, § 12650 et seq.). The complaint alleged that BOA defrauded the state by failing to pay over to the state amounts that Appellants contend should escheat as abandoned or unclaimed property under California’s Unclaimed Property Law (UPL; Code Civ. Proc., § 1500 et seq.). The trial court sustained BOA’s demurrer to Appellants’ first amended complaint (FAC) without leave to…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Bly-Magee v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Wells v. One2One Learning FoundationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Texas v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Delaware v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. Apotex Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2012
- Bank of New York Mellon Corp. False Claims Act Foreign Exchange Litigation ex rel. FX Analytics v. Bank of New York Mellon Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- (PS) Ashford v. YeeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- City of Los Angeles v. Cellco PartnershipDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- City of Los Angeles v. New Cingular Wireless National Accounts, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.