Legal Opinion

Bank of New York Mellon Corp. False Claims Act Foreign Exchange Litigation ex rel. FX Analytics v. Bank of New York Mellon Corp.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 30, 2012No. C 11-5683 WHAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

In this action for breach of contract and related claims, defendants move to dismiss. For the following reasons, defendants’ motion is Granted in part and Denied in part.

STATEMENT

Qui tam plaintiff (or “relator”) FX Analytics, a Delaware general partnership, filed this action under seal in Alameda County Superior Court pursuant to the California False Claims Act (“CFCA”). Under the CFCA, a person with independent knowledge of the facts may bring a qui tam action for and in the name…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re Bank of New York Mellon Corp. Forex Transactions LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  2. Alec Otto v. Nano f/k/a Raiblocks f/k/a Hieusys LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
  3. City of Los Angeles v. Cellco PartnershipDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  4. City of Los Angeles v. New Cingular Wireless National Accounts, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  5. City of Los Angeles v. Sprint Solutions, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API