Legal Opinion
Bly-Magee v. California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 2, 2001No. 98-56523PublishedCited by 496 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RONALD M. GOULD, Circuit Judge:
Charlotte Bly-Magee (“Bly-Magee”) appeals a judgment and order dismissing the qui tam action that she brought under the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733, against the State of California, the California Department of Rehabilitation (“CDR”), the Office of the Attorney General (“OAG”), former Attorney General Daniel Lungren (“Lungren”), and various Doe defendants. We affirm the dismissal with prejudice of Bly-Magee’s claims against the State of California, the CDR, and the OAG. We also affirm the dismissal with prejudice of Bly-Magee’s claims…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Joseph L. Pena v. Booth Gardner Lawrence Kincheloe Warden John Lambert Amos ReedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- IUE AFL-CIO Pension Fund v. HerrmannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by496 opinions
- Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Mendiondo v. Centinela Hospital Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Corinthian CollegesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Theodore C. Swartz v. Kpmg Llp, and Presidio Advisory Services Inc. Deutsche Bank Ag Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
491 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.