Legal Opinion

Tregoning v. Reynolds

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 2, 1934No. Docket No. 4984PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMISON, J., pro tem.

This action was brought by plaintiff to recover from defendants unpaid rent. Judgment was rendered for plaintiff. Defendants moved for a new trial and for an order vacating the judgment, and said motions being denied, they appealed. This appeal was brought up on the judgment-roll alone, although evidence was introduced at the trial.

Respondent alleges in her complaint that on the eighteenth day of August, 1927, she leased to appellants for the term of five years 600 acres of land at an annual rental of $1800, said rent payable in advance as follows: $900 on October 1,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Veysey v. MoriyamaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Riechhold v. Sommarstrom Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Coen v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Kelley v. LongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  5. North Pacific Steamship Co. v. Terminal Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Richard Barton Enterprises, Inc. v. TsernUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Lori, Ltd. v. WolfeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Groh v. Kover's Bull Pen, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Sierad v. LillyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Maki Et Ux v. NikulaOregon Supreme Court · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API