Maki Et Ux v. Nikula
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.
(Pro Tempore)
This was an action filed by the plaintiffs against the defendants for unpaid rental accruing on a lease after the premises were vacated by the defendants. The answer, among other things, alleged constructive eviction.
Trial was had before a jury which returned a verdict for the defendants. Plaintiffs moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, which motion was granted and judgment entered accordingly.
This appeal is by the defendants from that judgment notwithstanding the verdict.
On September 4, 1953, a written lease attached to the complaint as exhibit A was executed whereby…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McNally v. MoserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- Stone v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Barry v. FrankiniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Columbia Realty Investment Co. v. Alameda Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Giddings v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sigsbee v. SwathwoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Thompson v. PoirierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- D. M. Development Co. v. OsburnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- FREDERICK REALTY CORPORATION v. General Oil Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
- State Farm Fire And Casualty Company v. Cedar Avenue, LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.