Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint of Stodd

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1977No. OSB 1348, SC 25271PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

A trial board has found the accused attorney guilty of converting funds of an organization to his own use. The Disciplinary Review Board recommends that he be suspended from the practice of law for a period of two years and thereafter until he applies for reinstatement and demonstrates his renewed moral qualifications and general fitness to practice law in this State.

The accused stipulated to the following facts: He was for several years president of a non-profit association which sponsors a football program for youngsters in the Portland area. As president, he controlled the association’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re GreggOregon Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KimmellOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HolmanOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. In Re Complaint of PiersonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. In Re Complaint as to Conduct of MurdockOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CoeOregon Supreme Court · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API